Collectinator, No; Terminator, Yes
Thursday, June 24th, 2004California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has some good impulses. Also some not-so-good impulses. Schwarzenegger would like to rein in taxes and spending and regulation, rather than letting them run riot. He has made an effort to impose spending caps on the legislature, even if he failed to get the best spending-cap initiative onto the ballot. Maybe he can get a third of a loaf now and half a loaf later.
But the governor must do better, especially when it comes to matters completely within his own control. He must seize the day. Grab the bull by the horns. Terminate, not collectinate. Don’t blame me for that clunky neologism, “collectinator.” Arnold came up with that himself or one of his media guys did. He wants to use his Hollywood charm to extract all the federal dollars that he can for California. He says, “I expect to get a lot of it simply because, you know, I’m very persuasive and I’m like, you know, a tick that hangs on it and will not let go until I get what I want.” A tick, eh? Does he really want to put the “tick” back in politics?
California political reporter Dan Walters recalls that other governors of the state, including Gray Davis, pledged to bring home more federal bacon, and didn’t do so well. Even if Schwarzenegger can do better, shouldn’t he throw his weight behind nobler efforts? He set out to change California’s political landscape. No more politics as usual. Terminate, not collectinate. You can do it, Arnold.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.










