The good sense that California voters exhibited at the polls in May has been rewarded with continual attack and derision.
She’s criticizing the initiative, and she’s not alone.
Wrong target. California’s initiative process account for what little political sanity exists in the state.
The problem is spendaholic politicians.
But politicians and pundits continue bashing California’s ballot initiative process. Anything to deflect attention away from the inability of politicians to prioritize.
Even The Economist has taken up the bludgeon. A recent story, headlined “The ungovernable state,” said of the voter initiative process:
At first, it made sense . . . . The state in 1910 had only 2.4 million residents, and 95 percent of them were white. (Today it has about 37 million residents, and less than half are white.) A small, homogenous and informed electorate was to make sparing and disciplined use of the ballot to keep the legislature honest, rather as in Switzerland.
Is The Economist actually suggesting that a multi-ethnic electorate is incapable of democratic decision-making? I think we are witnessing the insider class move from condescending disdain for the people to a full-blown case of dementia.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.