Think Freely Media presents Common Sense with Paul Jacob

The money’s running out; the government is on a timeline. Something must be done before going into default.

Of course, the Executive Branch could prioritize spending, fiddle with accounts and still pay the interest on the federal debt as well as pay Social Security recipients — to year’s end. But it looks like the Obama Administration is just as committed to brinksmanship as the (heroic!) Tea Party folks who refuse to raise the debt ceiling.

And now the infamous “Gang of Six” re-emerge with a cockamamie proposal to “solve” the problem, mostly by saying they’ll “cut in the future” but keep mum, for now, what those cuts would be. It’s the typical lily-livered politician’s move.

The worst of the Gang of Six proposal, as fed-spending watchdog Dan Mitchell noticed, is that the alleged spending cuts don’t actually cut spending overall, just (get ready for it…) cut spending over planned increases.

We’ve been hearing this since the Carter era.

Something I haven’t heard from anyone (except my colleagues, of course — nothing from politicians, naturally) is a real cut that could substantially help.

Since the government is running out of money, cut federal wages across the board.

And make the cuts “progressive.”

How? Take any current federal government salary. Exempt the first (say) $60,000. And then cut the remaining salary level above that by (say) 20 percent. The exemption makes the rate cut in effect progressive. The “rich” would face greater income reductions.

Progressives should like that, no?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

By: Redactor

5 Comments

  1. michael says:

    what an excellent idea .

  2. Fishplate says:

    So, cut the fed salary progressively. Interesting thought.

    Since you presented this idea, you should be able to tell us how much of a savings will result…

  3. Bill says:

    Govt. position on spending “I will gladly pay tomorrow for a hamburger today”

  4. Drik says:

    The state government of Virginia cut spending. Now they are left with an increasing accumulation of surplus funds. Soon they will have no choice but to (gasp) cut taxes.

    The horror.

    Was kind of hoping that Texas would be the front runner and the first state to impose interposition on the money that the federal government extracts from citizens. (Interposition: where the state collects all taxpayer funds demanded by the federal govnernmant and places them in escorw, then forwards only the part that is due for actual Constituional purposes. A way to reassert state power and protect Americans without waiting for the repeal of the 17th amendment.)
    Now it looks like Virginia is pulling to the front in looking out for its citizens.

    May have to give up on moving to Texas.

    Virginia is for Lovers-of the Constitution.

  5. […] complex. “Discretionary spending.” And start by freezing the baseline spending. And cut federal salaries across the […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2017 Common Sense with Paul Jacob, All Rights Reserved. Back to top