The president’s recent attack on the Paul Ryan budget elicited no small amount of commentary and debate.
It’s fascinating to watch Cato’s Dan Mitchell “defend” the Ryan budget, while maintaining that it doesn’t really cut anything. The PBS host and his opposing talking head don’t seem to know what to do when someone speaks truth instead of blindly cheering for the Red Team or the Blue.
And yet it’s Dan Mitchell who gets tarred with the dread epithet “ideological.”
Question of the day: Do you laugh or cry?