If You Build It, They Will Come


During the presidential campaign, Barack Obama was criticized for telling business folks “You didn’t get there on your own. . . . You didn’t build that.”

He meant something more than the truism that a successful businessperson functions not in splendid isolation but in cooperation with others, like employees and vendors (presumably compensated). He meant that successful people shouldn’t be so proud of their virtues. Also they must pay more taxes.

Surrogates yipped that Obama’s denigration of individual achievement wasn’t what it sounded like. But his inaugural address was more of the same. Charles Krauthammer calls the speech “an ode to collectivity,” with its stress not on voluntary associations but on coercive orchestration by the state. According to Obama, for example, “No single person can” do all the good things like build research labs and train teachers that we supposedly must do “as one people.”

Sounds like a glaring false alternative. David Boaz observes that “property rights, limited government and the rule of law”—under assault by Obama—are what we need to safeguard the voluntary cooperation critical to our progress and individual flourishing. I would add that we necessarily pay our own way as we engage in voluntary trade. We do “build that,” and so does the other guy.

Government can confine itself to protecting our rights in trade and otherwise leave us alone, or it can actively plunder our achievements. If the latter, we have less of what we built. Even though we did build that.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

3 Comments so far ↓

  1. Jan
    Brian Richard Allen

    Too bad the half dozen actual Republicans in congress cannot grasp that Plunder is the “Democrats” End Game.

  2. Jan

    Obama did have it right in his speech. HE SAID, (PARAPHRASING)–” WE HAVEN’T FINISHED—-“.


    My 5 cents

  3. Feb

    After the economic collapse, and the civil unrest as hungry people get upset at the uselessness of monthly checks that won’t buy anything, and the declaration of martial law, and the invasion of the state’s capitals by Homeland Security to keep control (which will not have to wait for governors to request them, since they are a private army, not military) then we will have the perfect, centrally-controlled oligarchy, just like they had in the USSR. And those who undermine it may have to be closely monitored. And even killed. That was what the USSR failed to do.

    Oh they did?

Spruce up your comments with
<a href="" title=""><abbr title=""><acronym title=""><b><blockquote cite=""><cite><code><del datetime=""><em><i><q cite=""><strike><strong>
New comments are moderated before being shown * = required field Be sure to answer the simple math problem below to help demonstrate that you are a human rather than a spambot.

Leave a Comment

− 2 = four

2 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Common Sense with Paul Jacob » Archive » A Briefing for the President
  2. Common Sense with Paul Jacob » Archive » What Private Builders Build