Americans get riled up by the slightest things.
As numerous Facebook posts pointed out last week, feminists across the country were incensed that their beloved president complimented a prominent woman on her looks . . . yet remained unfazed by that same presidents’ policy of killing innocent women and children with drone strikes. Amongst conservatives, Fox News host Bill O’Reilly got harsh condemnations for using the phrase “thump the Bible,” despite “The No Spin Zone” host’s long service in defense of what he calls “Judeo-Christian” culture, and his lack of any malign intent. And, in sports news, Rutgers Coach Mike Rice got the pink slip for his violent, offensive treatment of his players . . .
But there’s no “but” with this story, except as identified by Nick Gillespie at Reason.com: “there’s another, more subtle and yet more profound way that Division I college sports is abusing most college students at most schools . . . even if they never suit up for a practice or attend a single varsity competition of any sort.”
What is Gillespie driving at? Subsidy. Particularly, subsidies from government-subsidized student payments:
The vast majority of colleges — public and private — massively subsidize varsity sports directly out of mandatory student fees and other school funds. Despite the ability of top-tier teams to earn a lot of revenue via television contracts, ticket sales, merchandise sales, and other activities, most schools still hit up students in both direct and indirect ways.
Gillespie gives us some disturbing numbers: In 2011, Rutgers siphoned off $9 million in student fees and $19.4 million in general school funds while producing about $23 million in non-donation revenue. George Mason University students pay $12 million a year for sports teams that pulled in much less than a million. Only eight Division I schools balk at subsidizing their athletics departments.
I love college sports. It’s sad to think that they are corrupting academic economies, just as pro sports corrupt city and metropolitan economics around the country. All by reliance upon subsidy . . . that sports programs can do without.
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
2 replies on “Spoiled Sports”
The argument that some people make in favor of the subsidies is that it brings publicity to the college or university that is unlikely to be achieved in other ways. Whether or not that’s true, I don’t know. I think that sometimes colleges do receive an uptick in applications when their sports teams do well (e.g. a team makes a surprise run in the NCAA men’s basketball tournament).
Whether or not the money subsidized is actually worth the supposed benefits is another question.
Anothe rpoint NOT RAISED– the salaries paid to college coaches and the cost of their staidums.
AND THE PUBLIC ( AT LEAST IN FL.) -WHEN SOMEONE GIVES/LEAVES 9IN HIS/HER WILL0 $MILLION FOR A STADIUM IN HIS/HER NAME. (One of the FL. universities received millions for a stadium -from the estate of (I beleive it was the father of a former FL Sec of State) to name a staadium in his honor. BUT 50% of the cost was bron by the public–a fact never mentioned.
Nor the costs of the additional infastructure, etc. nor what could have been spent on better teaches (perhaps less marxists and liberals)