Categories
ideological culture media and media people

For the People?

Sharing

Politicians always talk about how hard they work for us.

Of course, not even the most recent tumblers off the proverbial turnip truck believe them. Politicians don’t work so hard, first of all, and certainly not with the idea of putting what “We, the People” want ahead of what “They, the Politicians” want.

This is true across party lines. Republican New Jersey Governor Chris Christie is under fire and two high-level appointees have resigned over allegations that they closed two highway access lanes from Fort Lee, New Jersey, over the George Washington Bridge into New York City, causing a massive traffic jam just to punish the town’s mayor for not endorsing Christie in the election.

Working hard for the people or turning the screws of government for one’s own benefit?

Meanwhile, a new report by the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), an independent federal agency, finds that the Obama White House “systematically delayed enacting a series of rules on the environment, worker safety and health care to prevent them from becoming points of contention before the 2012 election.”

ACUS also determined that delays in issuing regulations “under Obama went well beyond those of his predecessors” and were caused by “concerns about the agencies issuing costly or controversial rules prior to the November 2012 election.”

Notice that the Obama Administration wasn’t willing to permanently shelve any rules as too burdensome. The only concern? Delaying the pain they intended to inflict on folks until after the election, when voters would have less effective means for expressing their disapproval.

Hardly working for the people; working hard for themselves.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

3 replies on “For the People?”

It would be so much cleaner in an admitted dictatorship, you would not have to worry about non-supportive mayors or citizen’s votes.
As it has often been stated, in many and various ways, democracy is the best form of government only because the others are all worse.
There is a rumor about a once existing constitutionally limited republic, do you know anything about that or what happened to it?

Jimmy Carter once told Assad (of Syria) THAT HE (ASSAD) IS A MORE LEGITIMATE RULER, THEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE US. Only the Wall street Journal printed the statement.

But, seems to support JFB– and why bother with elections/

Despicable all! Fully entrenched, narcissistic egotists that believe they rule, knowing what is best for the American people. Clueless fools they are, fatted by their own self importance. They are impotent to lead justly. As you would say, the solution is TERM LIMITS.

Leave a Reply to Karen Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *