Think Freely Media presents Common Sense with Paul Jacob

Let’s celebrate longevity. But should we specifically cheer one solitary person holding a seat of power for 60 years? Or rejoice over a single family maintaining a vise grip on a political position for a whopping 81 cycles around the Sun?

And . . . should that federal office continue to be filled by hereditary succession via the advantages of incumbency?

For 100 years? More?

Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.), 87, just announced his retirement after occupying a congressional perch for 59 years, the longest in history. He won a special election back in 1955, when the seat’s previous occupant, his father, passed away.

This “master legislator,” as an always-objective Washington Post news story called him, stated he was leaving because Congress had become “obnoxious.”

Trust me, we feel your pain, Mr. Dingell.

The Natural Resources Defense Council’s David Goldston told the New York Times that the “truly distressing thing” about Dingell and several multi-decade career politicians departing Congress “is that they’re the ones who know how to negotiate, know how to legislate, know how to get things done.”

Really? Then, why didn’t he help prevent the nation from sinking 5,600 percent deeper into debt, from $318 billion to almost $18 trillion during those last six decades?

Deadline Detroit notes that in response to praise from “fellow politicians, friends and media outlets . . . online commentators are having a field day ripping Dingell, his legacy, and even his wife, Debbie, who is widely expected to replace him.”

It turns out that Mrs. Dingell, occupation lobbyist, has indeed officially announced she will run for her husband’s seat, obnoxious as it no doubt is.

Can America survive a century of rule by Dingells?

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

By: Redactor


  1. Doug Watts says:

    Well, c’mon. We can at least rejoice that after Dingell leaves, Congress will become a little less obnoxious.

  2. Doc Savage says:

    No more Dingleberries in the House, please.

  3. Rose Bogaert says:

    It is so time to get rid of the Dingell Dynasty. It is part of the reason we are in the mess we are in. If it is possible, his wife is more liberal than him and we have to make sure she doesn’t get elected.

  4. Paul Jacob says:

    Great comments today . . . as usual.

  5. Rollin L. says:

    If memory serves, John Dingell was the man who originally made reference to the BATF as “jack-booted thugs” on video. I believe it was footage from an NRA convention or other event when he was still active in that org. When the NRA used that borrowed phrase in ad copy, they were vilified for it. Ignored by the “mainstream” media was the fact that one of their own liberal legislative darlings coined the phrase…

  6. Doctor Bill says:

    Just another glowing example of the stupidity of the US electorate in many (mostly democrat) voting districts.

    The sheeple get hosed by the policies enacted by their own elected officials (at every level) and yet are too dumb to realize the consequences of party loyalty.

Leave a Reply to Rollin L. Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2020 Common Sense with Paul Jacob, All Rights Reserved. Back to top