Categories
Accountability crime and punishment general freedom moral hazard nannyism national politics & policies

Inch, Meet Mile

Sharing

Give ’em an inch, they will take . . . a continent.

When Edward Snowden broke the secrecy of the NSA’s illegal surveillance on innocent Americans, many folks (especially those in government) said the snooping was OK, because

  1. it is necessary for our security, and, besides,
  2. the collected data would only be used against terrorists, as supervised by the FISA courts.

Well, it is now known that, whatever “a.” may be, “b.” is a dead letter, swept away by broken promises and a new information practice.

Yes, the National Security Agency now shares its (unconstitutionally obtained) information with various and sundry government agencies, for a wide variety of purposes.

Last week, Radley Balko noted in the Washington Post that “the ‘sneak-and-peek’ provision of the Patriot Act that was alleged to be used only in national security and terrorism investigations has overwhelmingly been used in narcotics cases. Now the New York Times reports that National Security Agency data will be shared with other intelligence agencies like the FBI without first applying any screens for privacy.”

That didn’t take long, eh?

Many of us have opposed the NSA’s data collection on American citizens because we believed the data would not continue to be used just for the alleged purpose they were collected.

It is not a “slippery slope” argument so much as an “inch-mile” one. Government tends to grow, in size and especially in scope.

And usually at the expense of our freedoms.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


Printable PDF

NSA, surveillance, 1984, Big Brother

 

2 replies on “Inch, Meet Mile”

Had the US not broke both the Axis codes in WW!! we might be speaking German and Japanese today. Enough with the overblown privacy BS, our countries security. is paramount!

The Nullification Movement (http://tenthamendmentcenter.com) is in full swing, one of its major targets to ‘anticommandeer’ state resources to the NSA and other spy agencies engaged in unconstitutional activity. This is a good approach that may soon bear fruit. The big question is, who among all the so-called major candidates is taking a stand against unconstitutional surveillance? Exactly! On top of nullification, the people need to start forming citizens’ grand juries–I have previously supported doing so through existing judicial officials, but lately I think the people just do a flash grand jury–and issuing indictments.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *