Think Freely Media presents Common Sense with Paul Jacob

The Long Road to Citizens United

Krist Novoselic, Citizens United, free speech, fairvote.org

Everybody is familiar with the standard theory regarding the Citizens United decision. Former comedian and current earnest socialist Sarah Silverman puts it this way: “Every politician takes money from Big Money, ever since it was made legal with Citizens United.”

Like most folks who talk this way, she doesn’t give a squeak of context. She barely even indicates that it was a Supreme Court case, 2010’s Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. She does not mention at all that the ruling overturned the FEC’s act of suppressing a political movie.

But there is a much wider context than such bare facts — and if you want a good synopsis, you could hardly do better than read my friend Krist Novoselic’s calm, reasoned “look at the history of attempts to regulate independent campaign expenditures.”

This “modern history” started with what the New York Times called Richard Nixon’s “revolution in political financing.” The Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 “required detailed disclosure of campaign contributions; set campaign contribution limits to candidates, parties and committees; set expenditure limits on campaigns, independent groups and individuals and created the first public financing of presidential campaigns and national conventions.”

And almost immediately the law began suppressing political speech and advertising. And led to a long series of court cases.

And decisions.

And revisions.

That define our times.

Krist (with whom I serve on the board of FairVote.org) provides the context you need to see through what he aptly calls “the hype” about “Citizens United,” as well as how the decision correctly removed the license given to the FEC’s role as “state censorship board.”

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


Printable PDF

Krist Novoselic, Citizens United, free speech, fairvote.org

 

By: CS Admin

2 Comments

  1. Brian wright says:

    This one Was a cause celebre for the left, and for the libertarian left. I think my analysis years ago helps to clarify the issues. http://brianrwright.com/CoffeeCoasterBlog/?p=2589

  2. 11th Gen American says:

    Every political contribution above $25.00, from whatever source, should have to be recorded on a website that is freely available for anyone to view prior to deciding whether to vote for candidates.  
    Under NO circumstances should any candidate running for office in the U.S. be allowed to accept political donations from foreign countries or foreign entities!

    There should be a MAXIMUM established at $5,000 from any one contributor to any one candidate! That limit of $5,000 should hold for contributions to SuperPACS as well.  Everyone should have access to the contribution lists for SuperPACS also. Corporation names should be recorded so voters can determine who is getting contributions from Monsanto, Haliburton,  employees of the U.S. Justice Department, etc. 

    Until we have complete transparency in government, and know where our elected officials are getting their campaign money, and what special interests are buying their votes, there will NEVER be trust of our government by the electorate.   

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


© 2016 Common Sense with Paul Jacob, All Rights Reserved. Back to top