Entering his campaign’s homestretch, underdog Donald J. Trump gave an important speech at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania. He emphasized his support for term limits in what he called his “100-day action plan to Make America Great Again.”
“[R]estoring honesty, accountability and change to Washington” is the top item on Trump’s agenda, along with a pledge to begin the drive for “a Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress” on his very first day in the Oval Office.
Public disgust with the corrupt status quo in Washington — and the hope that he will shake things up — drove Trump’s victory.
Yet, today, the Elections Committee of Michigan’s House of Representatives hears testimony on several bills to weaken or repeal term limits. Have the limits lost public support? Not on your life.
Politicians simply want to stay ensconced in power, reaping the many benefits they’ve bestowed upon themselves. They want to stay in power longer.
Just look to California. Back in 2012, a dishonest ballot explanation tricked voters into thinking they were tightening their term limits law. But what they were actually doing was voting to weaken it.
Now, Golden State legislators can stay in the same seat for a dozen years. And special interests have noticed. They’re “investing” more heavily than ever before.
The Los Angeles Times summarized the result in its headline: “Longer terms for California’s Legislature mean a flood of cash from interest groups . . .”
Here’s for enacting real term limits at every level of government. And if the politicians and special interests don’t like it — good!
This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.
1 reply on “Term Limits Trump”
I agree with the concepts of term limits but would tend to be more radical, limiting them to a single, perhaps more lengthy term, so there is never a thought of re-election. Also no pension or lifetime benefits. Public service and then a return to the taxpayer status, totally subject to the governmental impositions they have imposed or allowed to remain.