Categories
Accountability crime and punishment general freedom moral hazard national politics & policies privacy responsibility

In Plain Sight

Sharing

The Berlin terrorist attack just a little over a week ago fit a noteworthy pattern. German authorities had investigated Anis Amri — the Tunisian man who drove that large truck into a crowded Christmas market, killing 12 and wounding 56 others — and found “links with Islamic extremists.”

Later killed in Milan, Italy, Amri had been wanted in Tunisia for “hijacking a van” and jailed in Italy for arson and a “violent assault at his migrant reception center.” And yet with all that known or easily knowable, the German authorities couldn’t prevent him from killing innocent Germans.

It’s not just a European phenomenon, either.

Consider Omar Mateen, this country’s worst mass shooter, having massacred 49 people in Orlando’s Pulse nightclub. The FBI had spent ten months looking into Mateen.

Years before the Boston Marathon bombing, the FBI had tracked Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of the bombers.*

“In case after case . . . authorities have come forward after the fact to say that they had enough cause to place the suspect under surveillance well before the violence,” the Washington Post recently noted. This was the case with the majority of recent lone-wolf terrorism plots.

“If any lesson can be learned from studying the perpetrators of recent attacks,” a report in The Intercept concluded, “it is that there needs to be a greater investment in conducting targeted surveillance of known terror suspects and a move away from the constant knee-jerk expansion of dragnet surveillance . . .”

Yet intelligence agencies are still grabbing our metadata in violation of the Fourth Amendment. That needs to stop.

The fact that known threats are consistently not being stopped suggests curtailing mass surveillance won’t hurt our security, but improve it.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

 

* The same is true regarding the Ft. Hood (work-place) shooter, Nidal Hasan. Likewise, Abdulhakim Mujahid Muhammad (formerly Carlos Bledsoe), who was under the active eye of the FBI after returning from Yemen . . . until he opened fire on a Little Rock, Arkansas, recruiting station killing one soldier and wounding another. Ditto Ahmad Khan Rahami, the less deadly bomber in New York City and New Jersey.


Printable PDF

terrorism, surveillance, privacy, fingerprint, targeted, illustration

 

2 replies on “In Plain Sight”

Pretty much every ‘terrorist attack’ these days is false-flag state terror, certainly the publicized incidents like Berlin. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/12/23/zio-gladio/. Remember the mainstream media is embedded into the global cabal overwhelmingly following World War II via Operation Paper Clip and Operation Mockingbird. The legendary journalist Carl Bernstein in perhaps his best article ever published by Rolling Stone (in its best issue) in 1977 makes it clear that the CIA runs the MSM. (http://brianrwright.com/CoffeeCoasterBlog/?p=6848.) The transnational intel community runs the MSM these days, so my practice is to presume any ‘mass terror attack’ is a false-flag unless otherwise demonstrated by alternative media sources.

Hi Brian,

Please be careful about using URLs in your comments. Our site spam filter (which also protects the site against cyber attacks) often will trash comments with URLs.

Sorry for the difficulty.

Jim Gill, Site Manager

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *