Categories
Accountability First Amendment rights general freedom ideological culture media and media people moral hazard nannyism national politics & policies Regulating Protest too much government

Dbl Standard Destruction Co.

Sharing

Addison Barnes has just won a court case against Liberty High School of Hillsboro, Oregon. The court ruled that the school acted wrongfully when, early this year, it suspended him for wearing a “disruptive” T-shirt heralding a “Donald J. Trump Border Wall Construction Co.” 

Addison was awarded $25,000 for legal expenses, and the school has apologized to him, sort of, for the suspension.

“I brought this case to stand up for myself and other students who might be afraid to express their right-of-center views,” Addison says. “Everyone knows that if a student wears an anti-Trump shirt to school, the teachers won’t think twice about it. But when I wore a pro-Trump shirt, I got suspended. That’s not right.”

No, it’s not.

The outcome is imperfect. The apology offered by Liberty High does not acknowledge the glaring injustice of the suspension. It simply asserts that the school got the “balancing act” wrong between making students feel welcome and making them feel safe. (Because it is “unsafe” per se for kids to peacefully express political disagreements?) Nor was the teacher who imposed the suspension obliged to apologize personally.

Ideally, all schools would be privately owned, privately run. Then they could openly promulgate whatever silly policies they wished about what students may display on T-shirts, if anything. Market pressures would tend to discourage indefensible rules. 

But today’s schooling system is not ideal.

Have you noticed?

Meantime, let’s hope that the court’s decision will discourage other schools from imposing similar double standards.

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.

 


PDF for printing

 

2 replies on “Dbl Standard Destruction Co.”

“Ideally, all schools would be privately owned, privately run. ‘

I’m not sure how this would work.  Private institutions need a source of funding.   Not all students can afford to pay tuition at rates sufficient to finance teacher pay and pensions, to say nothing of the cost of maintaining a facility.

Add to that, a private facility has the freedom to choose its customers.   I had to pass an admissions test to go to a Catholic high school, and that was decades ago.   Don’t privately run schools mean there will be discrimination in selecting the student body?

1. The state can give vouchers to parents to use at the school of their choice.
2. How to handle that would vary by local situation. A rural area that could only support one school would have to be different than an urban area that could support a dozen or more.

Leave a Reply to Pat Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *