Think Freely Media presents Common Sense with Paul Jacob

Toxic Smile?

smirk, smile, Covington, MAGA, PC

Smirking is a subset of smiling. But what is a grimace? 

Nick Sandman, the offending Covington, Kentucky, Catholic high school student who triggered so much outrage last weekend, smiled. The effrontery!

Seeing a snippet of video, a social media mob formed, leaping to the conclusion that young Mr. Sandman was being disrespectful of an older Native American man who — chanting and drumming right up in his face — should have been “shown respect.” 

And not smiled? Instead, what: frowned? Cried? Bowed?

Smirks are irksome. Sure. But the young man’s facial expression seemed to me an attempt, only half-successful, to smile — a covered-over grimace. 

Understandable. The Covington youngsters — waiting to be picked up — had been targeted earlier by a group of nutty “Black Hebrew Israelites” who taunted at them for being . . . white. And the Native American man, Nathan Phillips, had singled Mr. Sandman out, violating his personal space. A grimace could be accounted for as putting “a brave smile on the situation,” as we used to say. 

But that was not how the Twitter mobs interpreted it. And of course the young Catholic students were wearing “MAGA hats” (pro-Trump “Make America Great Again” baseball caps) which were later said to be racist. And the pro-life rally he and his friends attended was said to be sexist

Can we all calm down? If we disagree on so much that even smiling is scandalous, maybe take a breath. 

In the midst of it all, economist Bob Murphy reminded us of the previous culture-war fracas, the Gillette “toxic masculinity” ad, tweeting “if you see a mob picking on a boy, Gillette wants you to intervene.”

Masculinity wasn’t to blame for the mobbing. 

Toxic political correctness was. 

This is Common Sense. I’m Paul Jacob.


PDF for printing

smirk, smile, Covington, MAGA, PC

» See popular posts from Common Sense with Paul Jacob HERE.


By: Redactor

4 Comments

  1. Fred says:

    It’s Sandmann!

  2. Ann Siegal says:

    Outrage precedes research these days…even in top media outlets.

  3. Karen H says:

    I applaud Nick Sandmann. I would never have been able to smile. (And to me that smile looked like discomfort / awkwardness not a smirk). I probably would’ve pushed the old man out of my face.

    A teen never should have been put in this situation to begin with. I personally blame the Indigenous Activist for picking on Nick. Had he wanted to make a point or statement; choose an adult. And where were the chaperones?! Had I been chaperoning this trip, I would have pulled this kid from the spotlight. Would’ve gotten in between Nick & his drum beating taunter.

    Don’t get me started on what I think of the media & the Twitterverse for the condemnation of this minor before the facts came out.

  4. Carl Fisher says:

    The story here was not anything that happened between boys and their confronters. The real story, in this case. was the motivations of the media for their purposeful distortions of the facts. They and the Hollywood airhead elite dug a pit for themselves and some of the fools are still digging.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2019 Common Sense with Paul Jacob, All Rights Reserved. Back to top